NRO BLOG ROW | THE CORNER |  ARCHIVES    SEARCH    E-MAIL    PRINT    RSS




Monday, November 02, 2009


Good News: The Stimulus Worked . . .   [Veronique de Rugy]

. . . because it allowed Obama to get a lot of cash to the International Monetary Fund. At least, that's what Simon Johnson, chief economist at the IMF until August 2008, argues in the New York Times:

our fiscal stimulus enabled President Obama to play a decisive leadership role at the G20 summit in April, bringing along both appropriate stimulus in other countries and timely support for the International Monetary Fund.

Thankfully, George Mason University's Russ Roberts and Harvard University's Jeffrey Miron present a different story about the stimulus.

But this debate is particularly interesting in the light of the recent job data that came out on Friday. Remember that the previous week, testifying before the Joint Economic Committee, Christina Romer told the Committee that we could expect the stimulus to have created between 600,000 and 1.4 million jobs. Turns out that recovery.gov reports 640,000 jobs created or saved. And that's assuming that these would have been lost jobs. And that's far from the millions that Romer promised earlier in the year.

More important, measuring total jobs “saved” by a piece of legislation is as difficult as measuring total crimes prevented by police patrols. That’s why no agency — not the Labor Department, not the Treasury, not the Bureau of Labor Statistics — has ever actually calculated “jobs saved.” As the University of Chicago economist Steven J. Davis told the Associated Press, using saved jobs as a yardstick “was a clever political gimmick to make it even harder to determine whether this policy has any effect.”

In the end, overall, government spending doesn’t boost national income or standard of living. It merely redistributes it — minus the share it spends on the bureaucracy that collects and spends our tax dollars. The pie is sliced differently, but it’s not any bigger. In fact, it’s smaller. This explains why, seven months into the stimulus, 49 out of 50 states have suffered net job loses.




 







 

© National Review Online 2009. All Rights Reserved.

Home | Search | NR / Digital | Donate | Media Kit | Contact Us